The Editor: A while ago a
friend asked me what I thought was the reason for the shortage of vocations
to the
priesthood
and
religious life. My
reply was that I did not believe there was a shortage of "vocations" to
either the priesthood or religious life. And then I went on to explain
what I meant.
I believe there is only one call by God for all of us -- for us to
be followers of Jesus, and by following him, to become holy, as
he is holy. That one
call is there for us all the time, and God provides endless opportunities
and occasions for us to respond.
The idea that there is only a once-a-lifetime call or vocation, and
that it is to a particular "way of life" is just silly. I know that
we have all heard that argument, that God calls us to a way of life, the
priesthood, religious life, marriage or a single life (that "single
life" part has only been a recent addition to the lexicon).
That idea suggests that God has no plans for us as children, or as
young people, no plan for a divorced person, no plan for a widow or
widower,
no plan for an ordained priest working outside of pastoral or parish
ministry, etc.
God loves his people, and he provides for people to minister to the
needs of his people. He calls good men and women, good children and
seniors,
people with a desire to follow Jesus by responding to the service needs
of his people.
God gives them the charisms needed for the growth and support of the
community, and he inspires the charity within these good people to
respond to the
needs of the community. Anyone living within our Christian communities
sees this to be so every day!
Part of the difficulty is that our institutional church starts by refusing
to recognize God's call to special leadership and sacramental service
to half of the people that God does call, to the women of this community.
Then further, our institutional church says that God can only be calling
people who believe that proper service is through a celibate lifestyle,
only by service within an institutional structure that too often values
structure and hierarchy and preservation of the institution above all
else, even above the need for sacramental and other service to the
People of
God in the community.
The difficulty continues. When the Spirit moves a person to want to
follow the example of Jesus, that Spirit helps the person to understand
that the
model of service and leadership Jesus left us was the washing of his
disciples' feet.
The episcopal palace, the perks of the clerical collar, the traditional
exercise of authority and control over an institution seem very remote
from that model left by Jesus.
When persons called by the Spirit to be of special service to God's
community honestly seek to respond to the service model of Jesus, they
have difficulty
seeing that model central within the modern example of institutional
clergy and religious life; the person called by the Spirit to a life
of holiness
understandably can decide that a response to God's call must lie outside
of canonical priesthood and religious life.
It is also tragic that some of the people drawn to seek a life as clergy
or religious within the institutional church may be seeking it exactly
because it does not follow the model of Jesus washing the feet of his
disciples. --
Gerald Regnitter,
Prince Albert